I see the current political scene as a battleground of words and ideas, and I don’t think “we” do ourselves any good by tearing down those that are on “our side”.
That applies to Rush, or Beck, or Coulter, or Savage, or Gingrich, or Levin, or Palin, or Bachman, or Romney, or any in a long list of others.
I may not agree with everything they say or do, but I think that attacking any of them would be self defeating, even though they all have, at one time or another, said or done something that does not fit my “ideal” of what they should project.
They are human beings just like me and they are not perfect; but I sincerely believe these people are on “my side”.
I save my attacks for the opposition, and I don’t shoot at the guys who share my foxhole.
When you say “Ann Coulter is a hack and a media whore.”;
(your post in #10 on this thread)
or “Ann is full of BS. You are free to follow her right over the cliff.”;
(your #53 on this thread)
what is that supposed to accomplish?
Re: Ann is a media whore
In one of her books, she actually had a chapter titled “who would Jesus kill?”
What on God’s earth does that accomplish?
I stand by my statement.....in fact I have believed that from the time read that chapter title.