Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Me and Louis Farrakan in agreement. Who'da thought?
1 posted on 03/28/2011 1:12:35 PM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GVnana
We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent
Truer words have never been spoken. Legal precedent be damned!
2 posted on 03/28/2011 1:16:26 PM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

A compelling reason to invade a frigging civil war in a desert..?

We running low on camel $hit and sand...?

What a joke this is.


3 posted on 03/28/2011 1:17:14 PM PDT by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
"We make them based on how we can best advance our interests in the region."

Well that's a good start, but what are our interests?

4 posted on 03/28/2011 1:17:30 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Shakey Jake said, " The hippies will never survive!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

I would add “logic” to the list of consistency and precedent.


5 posted on 03/28/2011 1:17:29 PM PDT by vrwc1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

The WH official could have stopped after WE DON’T MAKE DECISIONS.


6 posted on 03/28/2011 1:19:04 PM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
Using logic, we start with these:

And come to this conclusion:


7 posted on 03/28/2011 1:19:21 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
"We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent,"

A bold half truth that is bad enough without the additional truths the spokesman left out; as in:

"We don’t make decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent [or principles other than expediency]"

8 posted on 03/28/2011 1:20:07 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
He explained that there were compelling reasons to get involved in Libya as opposed to Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen and Syria,


9 posted on 03/28/2011 1:23:27 PM PDT by McGruff (Libya. A Wag The Dog scenario designed to prevent a government shutdown?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
No sense of precedent guided President Obama’s decision to intervene in Libya, administration officials said Monday.
10 posted on 03/28/2011 1:24:38 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Obama:If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun (the REAL Arizona instigator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

That statement makes it even worse, because their actions to date have one consistency: The WH wants to advance the purposes of Al Queda and the Muslim Brotherhood.


11 posted on 03/28/2011 1:28:05 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

That’s your interests not ours. You need to come clean on what the end game is here or you are find yourselves in a heap of trouble.


12 posted on 03/28/2011 1:34:33 PM PDT by Vendome ("Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it anyway")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

‘We don’t make decisions ... based on consistency or precedent’ —— “instead, we have a giant dart board that we pin issues to and Mr. President throws darts......”


13 posted on 03/28/2011 1:55:35 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


14 posted on 03/28/2011 2:00:54 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana
"We make them based on how we can best advance our interests in the region."


15 posted on 03/28/2011 2:08:57 PM PDT by Lucky9teen (Jobs? Nope! Economy? Nope! Disarm the U.S? Yep! Impeach the treasonous Marxist Muslim usurper bast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

Syria doesn’t have oil; there’s your precedent.


17 posted on 03/28/2011 3:20:53 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The heresy of heresies was common sense - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

Best give them some space. They’re pouring kerosene on themselves.


18 posted on 03/28/2011 5:03:11 PM PDT by yup2394871293
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GVnana

This war is about jobs. Get world war III going and US has to build more weapons for NATO .... Good union jobs.

Do we want more GUNS or BUTTER? This is an economic war. Its a War for JOBS, TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, and to Get re-elected as he wants to get people back to work with new jobs in the defense industry when all HELL breaks loose.

AXELROD AND OBUMMER have this scripted out to not only destroy the economy when WORLD WAR III erupts but he also knows that he can do anything he wants as he only answers to GEORGE SORO’S.


19 posted on 03/28/2011 5:55:41 PM PDT by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world or Obamaville USSA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson