Skip to comments.Live Thread: Barack Obama Speech on the Libya Kinetic Military Action 7:30 P.M. EDT 3/28/11
Posted on 03/28/2011 4:13:23 PM PDT by kristinn
Obama is scheduled to speak at the National Defense University at Ft. McNair in Washington, D.C. about Libya at 7:30 p.m. EDT.
Do you believe a thing Hillary says about her own aspirations?
They put eye shadow on him.
Ding, ding, DING!
"I am conservative . . . but quite liberal and getting much more liberal," he said. "What is the purpose of the country if you are not going to have health care. . . . It's an entitlement to this country." (Trump, re. possible Reform Party presidential candidate October 7, 1999)
“Winning The Future” = WTF = What The #$@!
“Kinetic Military Action” = KMA = Kiss My @$%
Not my artwork, but it’s very representative of Mordor-on-the-Potomac.
Listening to any speech by American “Traitor” POTUS, Barack Hussein Obama is a waste of time. Here’s the real skinny my fellow Americans. Qaddafi will stand. Jordan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Suden, Yemen, etc. will turn radical Muslim/Terrorist just as Obama wants them to. Obama, Wright, Farrakhan, Jones, Powers, Jarrett, Ayres, will celebrate along with George Soros on how dumb the American public really is and how destroying the American republic is like taking candy from a baby!!! Sad!!!
When Barry talks it’s almost like hearing an old 8-track player. Same thing over and over.
That’s a very interesting quote. I didn’t know he was thinking about politics back then. He and Hillary would have all the gimmicks sewed up - “business” “first woman” “faux conservative” “faux moderate”
Of course it only works for them if people are too stupid to realize that it’s a gimmick and not trickery. These people are as sincere as 0bama...
Are you saying one section of the WPA contradicts the other?
Trump officially joins Reform Party
October 25, 1999
Stone told CNN that Trump will soon begin travelling to Miami, Los Angeles and other cities to meet with Reform Party leaders to assess the prospects of winning the partys presidential nomination.
So Trump wanted to run a Trump/Oprah ticket? Is this guy Hollywood through and through or what??? And Pat Buchanan was in there, too. What a mixture of ego and bullcrap.
There is one thing I’ll give them some credit for though. Both Trump and Pat are very good analysts. What they do with what they’ve analyzed is what I have problems with.
But Trump a Constitutional Conservative? Not a chance. I have quite a bit of experience with hollywood types and I see it in Trump. I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw his Tower.
He failed to explain very simpy - ‘what is the final objective’. It’s one thing to say why we are there, but another to explain to us his definition of ‘mission accomplished’. I don’t think he even knows. When Gates doesn’t even believe we should be there, then I don’t think a true plan has been put together. God forbid if they send our men & women in and restrict them on their ability to defend themselves or engage.
It turns out it must have just been the station I was watching that made some sort of shadow above his eye, as I didn’t notice it when watching clips on other channels. HDTV I guess??
Easy fix - it just doesn't get reported.
Agreed. That is why I have said from the start of Trump jumping on the birther bandwagon ... watch what the other hand is doing.
Trump is getting mega free publicity and is missing vital points in the BC argument.
I smell a ‘Rat.
I believe you are right on the money. Thank you for the very informative links.
I am always gratified by the incompetence of these people, since I feel that it will contribute to their ineffectiveness, which can only be good for our country if they can’t get their agenda done.
That someone would allow him to go on national television with a smear of unblended (Teal!) makeup was hilarious to me...alas, a false alarm!
I think that is okay per the Constitution.
Do do I despite what the War Powers Act says. The primary purpose of the fedguv is to protect American citizens. The Constitution gives the CIC the power to do that, not Congress. So the CIC has to be able to make war on the bad guys when they attack American citizens which is why I had no problem with Obama or Reagan trying to kill Gadaffi.
Of course Obama is a marxist moron who claims that Gadaffi isn't the target but I didn't vote for the idiot. In spite of that I would not want to diminish the next Reagan the power to kill bad guys who harm Americans while Congress dithers.
I am saying that any law that forbids the CIC from making war on terrorists or countries that harm American citizens is no law at all and antithetical to the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. It is the duty of the federal government to protect it's citizens and the WPA forbids the CIC from doing just that under certain circumstances as I described above.