Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uranium Conference Adds Discussion of Japan Accident
New Mexico Tech ^ | 3/30/11 | Thomas Guengerich

Posted on 04/03/2011 9:05:45 AM PDT by finerobert

HOBBS, N.M. March 30, 2011 – The Uranium Fuel Cycle Conference has added a new special session to the event, scheduled for April 27-28 in Hobbs. “Japan and Nuclear Energy: What Went Wrong and Its Impact” will feature a policy impact presentation from an official from the Department of Energy.

(Excerpt) Read more at nmt.edu ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: bloomberg; chat; china; congress; globalwarming; japan; johnhofmeister; nuclear; nyc; obama; republicans
Conference organizer Dr. Daniel Fine of the N.M. Center for Energy Policy announced Monday that the additional event will give experts a forum to discuss public health and safety, which have stepped to the forefront of nuclear energy discussions since the accident in Fukushima, Japan.

Dr. Van Romero, Vice President of Research and Economic Development at New Mexico Tech, will give a technical presentation, explaining what happened and comparing the incident to the Three Mile Island incident of 1979. Romero also serves as a professor of physics. Previous to his academic position, Romero worked 12 years in the nuclear reactor industry.

Tim Beville, of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy, will join Romero in the special session, which will begin at 8:30 a.m. April 28. Beville will discuss how the accident in Japan will affect U.S. nuclear energy policy and programs.

“This will be the first public forum to review public safety issues in the nuclear energy industry since the incident in Japan,” Fine said. “This is terribly important because of the potential loss of public confidence in nuclear energy.”

Fine said that public polls showed that 60 percent of Americans opposed nuclear energy after the Three Mile Island incident. Public sentiment did not begin to change until 2005, he said.

“Do we want to see another generation of loss of public confidence in nuclear energy because of the accident in Japan?” he said. “That topic underlines this special session.”

Fine said Beville’s presentation represents the first time a Department of Energy official will present the federal government’s position on future nuclear energy development in America since the Japan accident.

“This is a major response in the Southwest and in New Mexico to create a national forum for nuclear energy in the future,” Fine said. “We’ll present a technical review of what went wrong in Japan, but also look at U.S. policy and program review in terms of the consequences of the Japan accident.”

Fine said the Uranium Fuel Cycle Conference will be the first public education event outside Washington to focus on Japan and its impact on nuclear energy in the United States.

In his presentation, Romero will examine what has happened at the Fukushima Reactor from a scientific and engineering perspective, without a political spin.

“My intention is to make sense of all the information available,” he said. “I want to put the facts out there and allow people to make an informed decision about the viability of nuclear power in New Mexico.”

Romero said he expects the incident in Japan to slow down development of new nuclear reactors in New Mexico, but he hopes recent events promote continued discussion about the future of American energy policy and how U.S. leaders can craft policy that promotes safe nuclear energy.

“The events in Japan have raised concerns about the safety of nuclear power,” Romero said. “If you listen to the news, it seems like there’s nothing but crisis after crisis. Yet, nothing has really happened. There is cause to be concerned. Like anything, there are risks; we need to understand those risks and act appropriately.”

Romero said two lessons learned from recent events are that smaller reactors are probably safer and that storing spent fuel at the reactor is not a good practice.

Also in the realm of public safety, the conference will address issues regarding development and licensure of reactors in seismically active zones, such as California, which gets 15 percent of its energy from two nuclear reactors, Fine said.

The event takes place in the energy corridor of Eastern New Mexico with capital investment in uranium enrichment and waste/storage and with uranium tailings recovery potential. Small Modular Reactor technology will be presented as a new and innovative technology choice for deployment.

Both Romero and Beville will present projections on the future of nuclear energy in the U.S. Southwest – also a conference first.

The Special Session is part of a planned two-day conference organized by the New Mexico Center for Energy Policy beginning the morning of April 27. For registration and information see the Center for Energy Policy website.

– NMT –

By Thomas Guengerich/New Mexico Tech

1 posted on 04/03/2011 9:05:46 AM PDT by finerobert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: finerobert

“Japan and Nuclear Energy: What Went Wrong and Its Impact”
Impact:
Germany is going to replace nuclear energy with green energy solar/wind/geothermal by 2020 or earlier. They’ll be independent of foreign uranium.


2 posted on 04/03/2011 9:17:01 AM PDT by buzzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buzzer
Impact:
Germany is going to replace nuclear energy with green energy solar/wind/geothermal by 2020 or earlier. They’ll be independent of foreign uranium.

Translation:
Germany is going to see skyrocketing electricity costs and an unstable, unreliable electricity supply that won't be able to support an industrial economy. That would be the same economy that has been keeping the Eurozone treading water lately.

3 posted on 04/03/2011 9:39:15 AM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buzzer

“Japan and Nuclear Energy: What Went Wrong and Its Impact”
Impact:
Germany is going to replace nuclear energy with green energy solar/wind/geothermal by 2020 or earlier. They’ll be independent of foreign uranium.”

LOL so they can buy electric from France.


4 posted on 04/03/2011 10:05:33 AM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finerobert; LegendHasIt; Rogle; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; ...
The event takes place in the energy corridor of Eastern New Mexico with capital investment in uranium enrichment and waste/storage and with uranium tailings recovery potential.

Just down the road from my location. I hope some of the national media pay attention. We (the US of A) can not afford to deep-six nuclear power due to one incident with circumstances never likely to be repeated (i.e. extremely earthquake/tsunami prone location, very outdated 40-year old technology).

NM list PING! Click on the flag to go to the Free Republic New Mexico message page.

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.

5 posted on 04/03/2011 11:19:56 AM PDT by CedarDave (Democrats believe in democracy when they have the votes; when they don't they believe in thuggery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Just down the road from my location. I hope some of the national media pay attention. We (the US of A) can not afford to deep-six nuclear power due to one incident with circumstances never likely to be repeated (i.e. extremely earthquake/tsunami prone location, very outdated 40-year old technology).

I think one could argue the earthquake part, there are undeniably more, and more powerful, earthquakes this decade. Now on the 40-year-old tech part, that's the real problem. Seems like an opportunity exists to replace those old reactors with more modern designs that will (well, "should") be more equipped to deal with a massive earthquake. I wonder if it's even possible to rip out the guts of an old plant and replace it with a new design?

6 posted on 04/03/2011 11:43:46 AM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finerobert

Talked to a scientist friend a few weeks ago ...he tells me because of Jimmy Carter the US does not recycle any of the spent uranium and it is just stacking up in various locations where it is very vulnerable to attack or accident ....Thanks Jimmy


7 posted on 04/03/2011 12:26:58 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittycatonline.com

Earthquake areas are well known. Anywhere on the west coast, around the New Madrid fault in Missouri and western Tennessee, and in the Yellowstone park area should be off limits for new nuclear plants. Other locations should be alright as far as earthquakes go.

Of course, designs will take into account earthquake protection wherever they are, but chances of extreme events occurring outside the areas listed above are very remote.


8 posted on 04/03/2011 12:35:22 PM PDT by CedarDave (Democrats believe in democracy when they have the votes; when they don't they believe in thuggery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Besides, the quake isn’t what caused the grief with the power plants in Japan. It was the tidal wave which swamped the plants’ systems controlling & powering coolant circulation.


9 posted on 04/04/2011 4:08:20 AM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: finerobert

Lets just have rapid deployment radiation harden Robots that can go into damaged reactors and fix their failures or secure their radioactive materials.


10 posted on 04/04/2011 10:03:29 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson