Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump sends investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama
CNN ^

Posted on 04/07/2011 7:20:45 AM PDT by quesney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361 next last
To: walterandrews
“I don’t think the risk is worth the reward.”

In all due respect, I don't think you realize the potential ramifications of obamas presidency to be deemed invalid.

Look, the riots and social upheaval are inevitable since either deep economic depression and/or hyperinflation are right around the corner (barring some miracle).

In my view, the risks are small and the rewards can be phenomenal.

101 posted on 04/07/2011 8:28:23 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Sarah Palin is America's Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances
Very well may be Trump is playing us, and healthy skepticism is warranted here. But thinking it through I don't see why Trump would fall on his sword for Obama and wind up looking like a total fool re the BC issue. He doesn't need Obama to set him up politically, financially, or otherwise.

For now I don't see how we need to either dismiss him or embrace him as our political savior. Let it play out for a while, at the very least we have someone with the necessary press access and invulnerability who is hammering Obama on his presidency as a whole, not just the birth issue.
102 posted on 04/07/2011 8:29:22 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: tgusa
If he finds something that Slick Willie and the Hildebeast missed, they’re gonna have coronaries.

If the Clinton's had anything it wouldn't matter ... they wouldn't go there ... they have way too much baggage of their own. This seems endemic in the ranks of 'rat presidential candidates.

103 posted on 04/07/2011 8:29:34 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flutters

Trump will simply ask him, right out. Obama will not be able to duck a direct a question. If Obama still refuses to address the question, he will still look like a fool for having allowed the question to fester in the minds of voters, undermining confidence in both the government and Obama’s leadership.


104 posted on 04/07/2011 8:31:54 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative
Grab the popcorn ladies and gentlemen, this could get good.

This is already good and it may be our only shot at salvation; it just isn't clear that our country could survive even two more years of the present government.

105 posted on 04/07/2011 8:33:19 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Batman11

“If NoBama does produce a LFBC at the last minute he will have to explain why he spent all the money he did, and used the resources of the Justice Dept., to fight all of the law suits about this. I’m sure he would throw some BS against the wall to try to explain it away, but at this point I doubt much of it would stick!”

He’d also have alot of explaining to do about why he’d let Lakin go to JAIL for his little “game” of hide and seek with the BC.


106 posted on 04/07/2011 8:33:29 AM PDT by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I would have thought the same thing. It depends on the nature of the evidence. I’m predisposed to believe the Donald already has a roadmap to rally people to demand the Congress take action. He’s a motivator.

If that means state governments refusing to acknowledge Obama’s legitimacy as POTUS until a hearing is held; then that’s probably what it means. There are a lot of Republican state houses now.

On the other hand, the far left CANNOT afford such a proposition to come into the light. So who knows what ends they would employ?

As for the Clintoons, it’s hard for me to see a way where the Democratic brand doesn’t come out gravely tarnished. I don’t see them involved because it is to their benefit to let Obama be a 1-term POTUS.


107 posted on 04/07/2011 8:33:42 AM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
I hope "the Donald" has used his billions to surround himself with body guards at every step.

That was one of my first thoughts, too. If Trump gets too close to the truth, his life my be in danger.

108 posted on 04/07/2011 8:34:57 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern, you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: varon
Now that Trump has national attention of Believers and Non-Believers, he will establish himself as the "decider". Whatever research or investigation is done on his behalf, he will hold the results close to his vest. Then as the "decider", will proclaim at a time for maximum impact that he is satisfied that Obama has met the constitutional qualifications for presidency. His 'authoritative' pronouncement will eliminate Obama's birth place as any issue of consequence for 2012 election.
Perhaps, but honestly pre-Trump it was a fringe issue that didn't hurt Obama politically, in fact may have been helping him as it looked like some isolated conspiracy nuts were after him. No one who supported Obama was wavering because of the BC issue. Trump is using the BC issue to get the most attention, but he is also hammering Obama on his actual governance as well. If it's all a shell game it doesn't increase Obama's support much as he is already considered by most a legit president even if he isn't
109 posted on 04/07/2011 8:35:35 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: quesney

Video of Donald on the Today Show this morning:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbgoizJ_yPc


110 posted on 04/07/2011 8:35:45 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jetson

This thing is Pure Pelosi.

“We have to elect Obama before we can find out who and what
he is”.

There is a “there” there.

deeptrout


111 posted on 04/07/2011 8:35:45 AM PDT by deep trout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
I don't think Trump is bluffing here. Not his style.

He doesn't put himself out there unless he is very confident he can win. On this issue, he must already have some damning information to keep pursuing it in such a public way.

112 posted on 04/07/2011 8:39:07 AM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida
As for the Clintoons, it’s hard for me to see a way where the Democratic brand doesn’t come out gravely tarnished.

The KKKlintlers follow one rule and one principle and only one: Look out for number one.

113 posted on 04/07/2011 8:42:38 AM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

“This is already good and it may be our only shot at salvation; it just isn’t clear that our country could survive even two more years of the present government.”

I believe you’re 100% right.

And I’ll bet a whole lot of other people think that too.


114 posted on 04/07/2011 8:44:17 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Sarah Palin is America's Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Useful pic. Here's a new version


115 posted on 04/07/2011 8:44:42 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Trump lets everyone know that he’s a smart guy so I think he would love to uncover Obama’s grades and take him down.


116 posted on 04/07/2011 8:45:05 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

I think the thing that keeps the Clintons from being as damaging as Alinsky/Soros/Obama is tha they are more greedy than ideological.


117 posted on 04/07/2011 8:47:00 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: quesney

Can anybody help me find the picture of a Chicago news article bio of state senator barack obama that states he was Kenyan-born. It seems to have been scrubbed from the internet.

Thanks!


118 posted on 04/07/2011 8:47:16 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Sad to say, but I think the corruptocrats in Congress and in the media would simply move to ditch that pesky little “natural born citizen” clause from the Constitution.

And of course the cries of “racism” may drown out any logical argument.


119 posted on 04/07/2011 8:49:48 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“Everything hints that there was wide scale fraud in this guy’s background.”

That is most likely the case. So, more heads than “O’s” will be on the block.

LOTS of people have culpability.


120 posted on 04/07/2011 8:49:58 AM PDT by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson