Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
http://conservativetimes.org/?p=796

Global Management: Agenda 21 (Part 1)

GuestAuthor

Posted under Free Trade & Globalism & Immigration & Judicial Activism & NeoCons & Neoliberals & Political Correctness & Politics

Global Management: Agenda 21 (Part 1)

By Dave Hodges

“The standard of living of the average American has to decline…â€

~ Paul Volcker (1979), Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

What does the North American Union, the European Union, IMF, World Bank, GATT, WTO, NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA, CANAMEX, NASCO, CODEX, the present state of American health care, The United States Conference of Mayors, The National Governor’s Association, The American Legislative Exchange Council, The Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Department of Education, No Child Left Behind legislation, the EPA, hate speech legislation, multiculturalism, Smart Growth, The FDA, The Federal Reserve, the global warming “crisis,†amnesty legislation, the rise of the American corporatocracy, record numbers of eminent domain proceedings, genetically modified foods, the implementation of communitarian law, the Earth Charter, the declining standard of living of the American middle class, the draconian police state tactics of Patriot Acts I & II and the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the unrestricted use of highly volatile fiat money have to do with each other?

All of the abovementioned are inextricably interwoven into a United Nations program, known as Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is in nearly every country and in nearly every city and county in America (Soveriegnty.net, 2007; United Nations, 2007a).

_____________________________________________

178 nations were signatories to the 288 page Agenda 21. President George H. W. Bush signed on behalf of the United States. Since Agenda 21 was “soft law” and not a treaty, Congress had no role to perform. Instead, the cabinet agencies of the Executive branch of government were charged with implementing this ‘global to local’ program.
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/index2.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=151&Itemid=81

_____________________________________________

What gives Agenda 21 Ruling Authority?
More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy during a signing ceremony at the Earth Summit. US president George H.W. Bush signed the document for the US. In signing, each nation pledge to adopt the goals of Agenda 21.
http://www.federalobserver.com/2011/04/03/deweese-agenda-21-in-one-easy-lesson/

_____________________________________________

Shall I continue?

17 posted on 04/07/2011 10:59:57 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Allowing Islam into America is akin to injecting yourself with AIDS to prove how tolerant you are .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: B4Ranch
I am looking for neutral news accounts of the 1992 Rio Summit, not passalongs in blogs. I have found from liberal sources that Bush signed a climate change accord and rejected a biodiversity accord at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. I have found that if you go to blogs for your source and that if they don't link to their source, or if their source is another blog, that often is a rabbit hole.

http://archive.greenpeace.org/earthsummit/docs/opedbushsecurity.pdf (yeah, it's greenpeace, but it does affirm that Bush signed the climate change accord)

http://www.progressive.org/media_1479

A leader in the effort to keep regulatory shackles off of big business was none other than former President George H.W. Bush. In Rio, then-President Bush was roundly criticized for refusing to sign the Biodiversity Treaty, one of the major products of the first Earth Summit

18 posted on 04/07/2011 11:04:53 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: B4Ranch
In looking at this further, I can't find a specific link showing the signatories of Agenda 21, but I wouldn't doubt that Bush signed it, as it appears the U.S. was a signatory nation from anectotal writings about it.

However, IMO it has about the same significanc3 as the U.S. signing the Kyoto Accords - diddly-squat as far as it having any legal standing for anyone who doesn't want to follow it, as neither Kyoto nor Agenda 21 were ratified.

And like Kyoto, some nutcase communities will set their own agenda regarding sustainability the way they have with climate change. And Democrats will push elements of Agenda 21 as part of their moonbattery. But I don't see it as having been ratified by the U.S. so it largely remains a conceptual threat akin to Kyoto.

19 posted on 04/07/2011 11:27:14 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson