[dep]

it’s not an official wisconsin election thread until a couple of people eat up the bandwidth arguing about what sean hannity was doing for a living 20 years ago. old computer discussions are a good try, but lack the ring of authenticity that a pointless argument about hannity carries.

[tatown]

lmao.

[Bear_in_RoseBear]

I'm not a follower of Hannity, so a discussion about him isn't an option for me. But if you really want to worry about people eating up bandwidth, go chase after the folks who have posted at least 7 articles about this news in the last 45 minutes or so, including 3 repostings of this particular article.

Or, you know, just celebrate the thought that a leftist may have been defeated at the polls, and try not to worry so much about the bandwidth eaten up by a single off-topic post.

[ratsreek]

Well, there is a tiny fiber of relevancy to the old computer dialogue. But yeah, I somehow feel this can’t be true until we get a full report on what Hannity had for breakfast on this day in 1975.