Which speaks directly to my last, which see.
Furthermore: If it was the Supreme Court that invented the idea of fatherhood for the propagators of bastards in a holding of the Court, then that is case law not constitutional law and is subject to revision and review by any subsequent session of the Court, or any act of the Congress.
It also would arguably not apply to The Won because he was born in 1961.
It also would not modify the black-letter law spelled out in Article II.
The USSC decided that fathers for bastards was an equal protection (XIV) issue.