There is a Constitutional birth standard. It’s really quite simple. I’m paraphrasing, but the core of it is this: To be eligible to run for president one must be a native born American (i.e. born of an American father on American soil).
In the days before the deceiving and lying Marxists came along political parties wanting to run a presidential candidate had to sign a document attesting to the person’s eligibility. Also, in the days before the Marxists took over the media, objective reporters did their own fact finding and basically verified a persobn’s presidential eligibiity.
The Marxist demrat party does not subscribe to the US Constitution so Pelosi, as the leader of the Demrat Party at the time, had absolutely no qualms about lying about Onada’s eligibility in that document. And the media, the Demrat Party propaganda organs, simply followed the party line.
If this Constitutional requirement did not exist, do you think The Usurping Marxist Onada would be spending millions of dollars in legal fees to squelch demands to see a credible birth document?
As I have said previously, can you imagine the reaction if, in 1788, someone argued to Benjamin Franklin et al. that the son of British subject, thus an Englishman by birth, could be President of the United States?