I do know. We just have to come to grips with the fact that HI certifies his citizenship. The only valid point, short of proof we don’t have, is his father was a British subject.
The DPH is the Democrat Party authority in Hawaii in charge of requesting, reviewing and verifying the legal qualifications of a candidate’s eligibility for inclusion on the Hawaiian ballot, in compliance with state and Constitutional election laws.
Ultimately, the DPH’s rejection of Obama was due to a refusal by Obama to make available the original documented evidence confirming his eligibility. However, this justifiable lack of certification by the DPH was followed by a covert attempt by the Democratic National Committee, chaired by Nancy Pelosi, to artificially proclaim Obama eligible in Hawaii by submitting two separate, sworn Official Certifications of Nomination (OCON) for Obama, each containing different legal language
Not quite. his mother was too young for her to confere citzenship on him, and she may have alienated herself and Brack by leaving the country and letting her new husband adopt him. Of course, he may have repatriated himself and this could have been done by the inattention of the authorities. The law with regard to odd cases is hardly explicit. The very court decision Wong van Ark(?) that set the precedent for anchor babies. actually has to be evealuated in terms of the law in place at the time. The Chinese Exclusion Act set the legal staage at that time. Ironically, the fact of his having been born in Germany—and brought to the US at age of three. Was probably all that kept John Peter Altgeld from being the Democratric nominee for President in 1896.