[Responsibility2nd]

 

 

 

Bachmann replied, "Well, then that should settle it."

"So it’s over?" the host asked.

"That’s what should settle it," she said. "I take the president at his word and I think — again I would have no problem and apparently the president wouldn’t either. Introduce that, we’re done. Move on."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2707790/posts

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Seizethecarp]

“That’s what should settle it,” she said. “I take the president at his word and I think — again I would have no problem and apparently the president wouldn’t either. Introduce that, we’re done. Move on.”

Note the use of the future conditional, i.e. she is talking about events that have not yet occurred! She is actually tweeking Obama in a snarky way by saying “apparently the president wouldn't either.”

Bachmann is NOT accepting the premise that the president has EVER “introduced” his COLB into evidence and she is challenging his to do so.

How many folks on FR believe that the COLB has been doctored? Bachmann know the if the president takes her up on her snarky dare and introduces the COLB as evidence in AZ, it will open the possibility of discovery of the “best evidence” which is the 1961 vital record file.