[rockrr]

I'm sure they'll get right on that just as soon as they finish a little housekeeping on that Texas v. White case that sticking in their craw.

[Who is John Galt?]

I'm sure they'll get right on that just as soon as they finish a little housekeeping on that Texas v. White case that sticking in their craw.

Since you raised the subject - care to defend the reasoning (including the justices' rather creative interpretation of "history") in the majority opinion in Texas v. White? We'll see how much you learned from Non-Sequitur...

(By the way, good to see you back, my friend! We were a little worried about you there, for a while, when your home page said you were 'banned or suspended'... ;>)