Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

The discussion is Morse..lets stick to him..for the moment..did you read the highlighted sentence..did you see the number 4..did you look..down the page..Droit des Gens..he references 212. I posted 212 from the referenced book.

He writes in English the book is in French. What is he telling us about section 212..its meaning..


1,503 posted on 04/29/2011 8:05:15 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1502 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1

The discussion is not Morse, but US Law and what the Founders and states were thinking of in writing and ratifying the US Constitution.

NBC was in use as a legal term prior to 1787. Were they thinking of the legal term used by states as a substitute for NBS, or were they thinking of Vattel & indigenous? If the latter, why didn’t they use indigenous? If the latter, then why didn’t the states change their laws to reflect Vattel instead of English common law? Why didn’t they make parentage the critical factor in citizenship, rather than birthplace?


1,506 posted on 04/29/2011 8:20:55 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson