Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman
It appears, wherever the “scanned” section came from, the green security background text has been digitally placed behind it.

It was copied onto security paper. Jeez, I'm amazed by the capacity of folks to hear hoofbeats and look for zebras.

536 posted on 04/27/2011 8:19:43 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]


To: ReignOfError
It was copied onto security paper. Jeez, I'm amazed by the capacity of folks to hear hoofbeats and look for zebras.

It truly is amazing.

565 posted on 04/27/2011 8:28:41 AM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

To: ReignOfError

“It was copied onto security paper.”

Possibly, but the digital artifacts just don’t look like it was printed on security paper and then the entire thing was scanned like that. Also, if you look at some of the other news stories (Sun Times, Christian Science Monitor), there is another copy of this same document that was apparently handed out by the White House to the press, that is on plain white paper background, with no evidence of the security paper background. Now, when you photocopy security paper to plain paper, it will not copy an exact facsimile of the security paper, but there will be obvious evidence that the original was on security paper. These copies appear to be copies of an original on plain white paper.


1,173 posted on 04/27/2011 1:54:43 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson