Posted on 04/27/2011 6:58:01 AM PDT by Polybius
check out post 171 its the same .
True! This is a "document release" that is a real attempt to HIDE the original.
Digitally Layered Birth Certificate
I fail to understand this belief that in an era when there was NO STANDARD that failure to adhere to that nonexistent standard means something.
That's very interesting. Thanks.
What exactly did Judy Corley hand-carry from Honolulu to the WH? Was it just paper? Who made the PDF with the silly green pattern?
What is this?
Here's a quick theory, unsupported by research: The image above is of what Corley couriered. The White House made the PDF and added the green security paper pattern because they know the birfers love to get all wee-wee'd up analyzing it. IOW, he doesn't really want the controversy so early in the 2012 cycle.
Yes...the website came back up.
Following an "IF" you can say most anything you wish.
If it was originally done on a standard form then it was done with two different typewriters.
There should be OTHER forms from the medical centers that MATCH these typewriters. If there are not, then it's probably just something put together up at Langley.
New, updated, irrefutable version this time.
I’ve asked that question before, too. He would be a Junior, but in any case, it wouldn’t be part of your legal name.
It appears that in fact there was a standard nomenclature....
Well, it is meaningful only with a high resolution digital image or a high resolution film of the original document.
If you right click on the PDF and repeatedly Zoom, the letters turn into a very coarse group of pixels that are beyond any meaningful analysis.
In an article now linked on Drudge, the writers are now arguing about whether the green background curves properly or not.
The idiots have never thought to ask how Stanley Ann Dunham ever signed an original document that had a green, computer generated pattern in the first place. Hello! It's computer generated art work. There was no green background on the original.
The solution to this mess is in Post 168:
1.) Original document
2.) Digital camera
3.) Be transparent and allow the media to photograph it.
If the original no longer exists and this image is from microfilm, then be transparent and allow the media to see the microfilm roll.
“You all got what you wanted. Hes released the long form. Give it a rest!”
“So, the rest of his lifetime paper trail is immaterial?”
Strawman much? Give the birthplace/birth cert issue a rest was his point. Obama was born in Kapiolani hospital in Honolulu and that has been settled. It was actually settled a long time back but this puts the nails in the coffin on it. Obama was born in Hawaii. Nothing was said of his later paper trail and gaps in it.
You want to focus now on getting his college transcripts - be my guest. He was probably a lousy student, despite getting into Harvard Law.
“Obama didn’t release anything new. He released the same old COLB. “
Not true. This is the long form BC that has been requested, with the attending physician signature, hospital, details, and signature of his mother. Accepted on 8-Aug 1961.
There are no more birth certificate inquiries to make, this is a true image of the original BC on file.
You got all there is. He was born in Honolulu.
“No where on this document is a Doctors name mentioned.”
The Doctor SIGNED it, it has his SIGNATURE. And they know the doctor and yes, he was an attending physician at Kapiolani.
“Does not pass the smell test. But it never did or will.”
Wake up and smell the coffee. It’s real, he was born in Hawaii. It only confirms what has already been pretty obivous and clear. Birthers have been Punk’d.
Obviously we are going too fast for you, so I’ll say it slowly: According to the US Constitution, the President must be a “natural born citizen”. So as not to confuse you too much, that essentially means that person must have been born in the US of parents (that’s plural) who are also citizens.
And, for the record, his history, which has been purposefully hidden, is pertinent - we (that’s us, the American people) deserve to know who our President is, other than he was a community organizer in Chicago, but I’m sure you don’t care why or what the pertinent questions are.
“Did not exist” is pretty overarching. And you are wrong. There was NO standard nomenclature at the time and it was common to see “nig” and ‘ngr” ~ where today we’d say “black”.
I fail to understand this belief that in an era when there was NO STANDARD that failure to adhere to that nonexistent standard means something.
“Now, not to rehash old news but why does the “birth certificate” list Obama’s father’s race as “African” when “African” is not a race, then or now, as pointed out in the 1961 vital statistics manual.
Via Page 231 of the:
VITAL STATISTICS OF THE UNITED STATES 1961 - VOLUME I - NATALITY
Race and color
“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.” The category “white” includes, in addition to persons reported as “white,” those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father. The exception refers to a mixture of Hawaiian and any other race, which is classified as Part-Hawaiian. In most tables a less detailed classification of “white” and “nonwhite” is used.”
So, as you can clearly see, the term “African” was not used on birth certificates, EVER! The complete manual can be viewed below.
Again, why is a Continent listed as Obama’s father’s race?”
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/time-to-move-on-to-obamas-natural-born.html
“I think that Obama can be beaten on the issues but why not soften him up a bit with this? “
With WHAT? A lie that the media uses to ‘prove’ Obama’s enemies are in-bred racists who cant even rub enough brain cells together to form a reasonable conclusion on where Obama was born.
“People are obsessed with this, not for the reason that you suggest, but because something seems out of order in this whole situation.”
Yes, the meme is - people want to believe a bad thing (even if debunked and disproven) about Obama because they dont like him.
“He still needs to provide some explanations.”
He just did today.
>> because they know the birfers love to get all wee-wee’d up analyzing it
That’s what I believe. Nonetheless, the story in its entirety is still bizarre, and not exactly ‘transparent’.
Dude, your slipping from hardcore conspiracy theorist into the realms of pure blathering insanity.
No doubt, the leftwing websites will be mining these quotes for gems on how stupid birthers are.
OF COURSE the long-form birth certificate will have a 'comibination of 1961 era typing and modern green thatch paper... Duh, that because they made an image copy of the original, printed it on the modern green thatch paper, and put the Hawaii attestation of authenticity on the bottom.
It's real, and anyone pretending it's not is simply grapsing at conspriatorial straws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.