Dude, your slipping from hardcore conspiracy theorist into the realms of pure blathering insanity. ..... Longbow1969
No doubt, the leftwing websites will be mining these quotes for gems on how stupid birthers are. ..... WOSG
First of all WOSG, I am not a "Birther".
Second of all, is it your contention that Stanley Ann Dunham signed a piece of paper in 1961 that had a 21st Century digital background pattern on it?
Really?
See Post 168.
Regardless of anything else, that PDF is a computer generated, manipulated document. In the current vernacular: "Photoshopped".
It's not Rocket Science. You get an image of an original document from 1961. That's Layer 1. You then layer that over a pretty and fancy digital background which is Layer 2.
Have you never played with Photoshop before?
Any way you slice it, it is still a computer manipulated document and, once you manipulate a document, trust goes out the window.
It is NOT an undoctored orinal photo as shown on Post 168.
As I have said, I am not a Birther but I know that you will not convince the Birthers with an obvious Photoshop document.
You two are being just as pig-headed as the most stubborm Birther.
Simple test: Do you agree that Obama was born in Hawaii?