Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Little Pig

I’d say do an updated p-51.


12 posted on 04/28/2011 10:00:22 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man

P 47 would be better, with the radial engine for the pilot to hide behind. p-51 was better at speed and at altitude, but with an inline engine, a water filled radiator and liquid cooling, had much greater vulnerability.

“The P-47 was a 20mm sponge. It could take numerous cannon hits. I can attest to that.” Erich Hartmann, Luftwaffe


16 posted on 04/28/2011 11:33:07 PM PDT by donmeaker ("To every simple question, there is a neat, simple answer, that is dead wrong." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Secret Agent Man

51’s didn’t like ground fire. You need a fast plane that can carry a load like a Corsair or a P-47. Skyraiders were a good choice. It’s has to fly faster than a DshK can be tracked on you.

Afghans popped SA-7’s at AC-130’s. You need to move fast and loiter a long time.


21 posted on 04/29/2011 6:58:24 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson