Agree.
Folks, pay attention: Just as Watergate was about the cover-up not a botched burglary, this story is now about the creation of an official document that was presented to the American public as if it were something it is not.
My theory is that the original paper BC was destroyed long ago when vital records were microfilmed. That film contains the image of the “curl” of the paper in the book, and whatever was originally typed or written on the form. The microfilm was later destroyed when vital records moved to digital form, so now all we have is a scan of a microfilm of a piece of paper. In other words, an electronic image that has no “provenance” or proof that it is what it purports to be.
This is just a theory but it makes sense. What does not make sense is why anyone would accept what the WH put out as anything more authentic than what any Photoshop user creates every day.
Well, freeper Danae received a requested copy of her paper BC recently, from Hawaii Vital Records, and received a photcopy of the original paper document. John Klein tried to float the lie that all papaer had been destroyed when electronic method was adopted. I picked up the phone and called Vital Records in Hawaii and was told that was bunk, that the state spends a considerable sum each year to maintain vaults of vital paper documents, including BC and wills and land titles and ... well, you get the picture. In Barry Bassturd’s case, there was likely never a real BC from an Hawaiian hospital anyway, so the criminals in Hawaii running that government puleld a ‘Bergerizing’ and put some data in for thier little god, probably when Axelcrombie was making all that noise about looking for original documents.
Former Hawaii Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino examined President Obama’s original birth certificate twice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9D4n6_Uifk
Fukino says she has seen the original BC twice. That would makes it seem as though there is still a paper copy. But what 0bama released this week sure did not look like a copy or scan of a paper document.
Considering your position that the BHO latest release of a purported BC may be valid because original documents were destroyed after being digitized into computer files...
Why is it that I can go to Ancestry.com and view the military registrations for WW I, or the census records from the 1840s? ....I believe it’s riduculous to think that a US State would destroy valuable historical records, just because they transcribed them into computer data.
That is a lame excuse by Hawaii and the Obama administration, to try to explain the childish latest release of a COLB instead of a long form BC with all the info.