I heard on the news and on a local talk radio show that Osama was postively identified by DNA. If he was killed less than 20 hours ago, isn’t that a little quick to positively ID someone by DNA? Also, who did the DNA sampling? The Navy Seals? Was a medical examiner or expert on hand to do the testing? From what I understand it takes at least 72 hours (3 days) to get a DNA result, and even then, the determination is “probable” of it being Osama. It would be nice to hear an expert on this area go on television to talk about this. Also, where are the pictures if any?
I'm not up to speed on all of this, I was watching a replay of the Nationals/Giants game last night and didn't listen to alot of the reporting but something stinks.
I heard a report that the operation took place about a week ago, but they waited to report it to be 100% sure it was OBL (DNA, etc.).
Exactly...there’s no body now, apparently, to confirm these findings by various people who can and should do just that. DNA is not conclusive nor would it be acceptable as that in the scientific community.
I have a family member who phoned this morning who is scientifically minded and he was livid...said as soon as they reported the burial at sea he knew it was all faked. On something as important as this you darn sure want a host of people confirming this.
Pictures won’t do it because they can be doctored. And if they have them they should have made them public by now and haven’t done so. That delay, if they have any, is as suspecious as Obama waiting an hour before making his statement, which was time enough to rally the students from the colleges nearby to the whitehouse.
Reporting this late in the evening....delaying his speech...and within a few hours announcing he’s been buried at sea....all very suspect indeed!
I've been asking that question myself. As they were prepping the body "in accordance of muslim tradition," the examiners took a sample, ran it through a lab and came back with a conclusive match?