To: Lazlo in PA
Wouldn't entombing his body at some site where he can be worshiped by the filthy rag heads be more dangerous? Dumping this garbage at sea is not a bad idea. That was my thought. A burial site would become a shrine. Anyway, they said on the radio that it was difficult to find a country that would accept his body, and they only have 24 hours to bury him.
55 posted on
05/02/2011 10:04:08 AM PDT by
proud American in Canada
(To paraphrase Sarah Palin: I love when the liberals get all wee wee'd up.)
To: proud American in Canada
That was my thought. A burial site would become a shrine. Bury him right next to the Fukushima Daiichi power plant, and let his admirers file in and visit...
To: proud American in Canada
If they had fed him to the hogs we would have seen a world wide Muslim uprising.
Feeding him to the crabs was probably a better idea. Of course, it makes a “hadj” to his tomb a bit more difficult.
129 posted on
05/02/2011 10:57:07 AM PDT by
BwanaNdege
("Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less." M Rosen)
To: proud American in Canada
Found this on a website about Muslim burial at sea...
624. If it is feared that an enemy may dig up the grave and exhume the dead body and amputate its ears or nose or other limbs, it should be lowered into sea, if possible, as stated in the foregoing rule.
270 posted on
05/02/2011 6:30:39 PM PDT by
magritte
("There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself "Do trousers matter?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson