Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dead

“Ask them what they would do if George Bush unilaterally ordered a team of hired killers into a sovereign nation to shoot a confused unarmed old man in the face, MURDER (emphasis added) those around him, then whisk his body off and toss it in the middle of the ocean, then refuse to release any video or photographs of the event. Would they be cheering and high fiving then?”

Now you are using the term “murder.” We should choose our words carefully, just as should the reporter. We are in a war, Osama was an enemy commander, and Osama was apparently killed by a SEAL team. From the confused statements coming out of the White House, I am not sure we can be confidant of much more than that.

There may be a possibility that Osama was murdered. If he was trying to surrender at the time he was shot, if the shooter knew Osama was trying to surrender, and if the shooter knew that shooting Osama was not necessary for the safety of the SEALs, then maybe the correct term would be “murder.” However, I certainly do not know the nuances of U.S. and international law. For example, it may be that the President can lawfully order the execution of an enemy commander during wartime, even if the enemy commander is trying to surrender and the execution is not necessary for anyone’s safety (I doubt that the President can lawfully do that, but I do not know). What I do know is that the SEALs deserve every benefit of any doubt and neither any of us nor the ditsy reporter knows what happened; and therefore, we need to be careful about the words we use.


173 posted on 05/06/2011 11:08:22 AM PDT by olrtex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: olrtex
“Ask them what they would do if George Bush unilaterally ordered..."

Absolutely no doubt, they'd be drawing up articles of impeachment right now. Rapturously. "We got him! We got him!" they'd cheer, and it would not refer to OBL.

185 posted on 05/06/2011 11:28:02 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Bad posters drive out good; don't post and drive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: olrtex
My use of the word "murder" was in a scenario of a liberal describing the exact same actions by George Bush. Of course, they would use the word murder, unless they could think of something even dopier, like "chimpymcbushiegenocide" or something.

It's all just semantics anyway. The Seals did what they were ordered to do, and that's all that matters. Murder is a legal definition, and the act was committed in Pakistan. They can label it murder if they like, and they can send the Paki police to America to find and apprehend the Seal team, if they can.

The Seals shot bin Laden dead, as ordered and as he deserved. It's war and he was a very dangerous combatant that the Seal team (and their commanders all the way up the chain) did not wish to take chances with. He had several thousand kills under his belt to reinforce that evaluation of the situation.

209 posted on 05/06/2011 1:58:27 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson