That puzzled me, too. So I started searching to find out if TXE had any real meaning. To my ultimate surprise, I learned that TXE is an actual term used in computer jargon to refer to data files. It is very possible that Hawaii uses the term to refer to the records in their paperless system.
At any rate, here are a couple of links to show you the progression of this argument from beginning to end:
Beginning—
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2712232/posts?page=49#49
End—
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2712636/posts?page=728#728
Without the ability to break apart the layer with the certifying statement, it is probably not possible to say whether this particular letter was doctored. I have asked a specialist to look at it. No return response. May not get one. There is plenty wrong with this document even if this is never proven. I’ve noticed that many at FR are spelling “the” “txe” in their posts as a way of referring to the fake nature of the document. I think that is fun! Anyway, I hope I answered your question.
Thing is I hang out with geeks and no one knows what TXE means.
The other problems are that all other COLB Abstracts do not use TXE.
Further “OF TXE” is in bold type.
So two things that don’t occur on any other examples and the question is “Why?”
What makes Barak’s COLB different and why is it different?