Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Blocks Liu
national Review Online ^ | May 19, 2011 | Andrew Stiles

Posted on 05/19/2011 11:55:08 AM PDT by Parmenio

Senate Republicans have successfully filibustered the nomination of Berkeley law professor Goodwin Liu to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The final vote on cloture was 52 to 43, with one Senator (Orrin Hatch of Utah) voting “present,” well short of the 60 votes required to end a filibuster. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R., Alaska) voted yes, while Sen. Ben Nelson (D., Neb.) voted no. Sens. Bauchus, Hutchison, Moran and Vitter did not vote.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: goodwinliu; hatch; judges; liu; murkowski; obamanominee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Rat Murkowski shows her true colors.
1 posted on 05/19/2011 11:55:11 AM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

I hope this can help give the GOP more courage for future battles. See, if enough stand together, Obama can be stopped.


2 posted on 05/19/2011 11:59:00 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio
This is good news though. Liu had no business on a federal appeals bench. It means he hasn't a hope in hell of reaching SCOTUS either.

Why did Hatch vote present?

3 posted on 05/19/2011 11:59:40 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Obama will be president until 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Scottish law precedent.


4 posted on 05/19/2011 12:00:39 PM PDT by Steve_Stifler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Orrin:

Bye Bye in 2012 primary- we do not need a spineless former best bud of Teddy Kennedy representing us.


5 posted on 05/19/2011 12:00:59 PM PDT by slapshot ("Were not gonna take it anymore" Twisted Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Orrin:

Bye Bye in 2012 primary- we do not need a spineless former best bud of Teddy Kennedy representing us.


6 posted on 05/19/2011 12:00:59 PM PDT by slapshot ("Were not gonna take it anymore" Twisted Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Orrin:

Bye Bye in 2012 primary- we do not need a spineless former best bud of Teddy Kennedy representing us.


7 posted on 05/19/2011 12:00:59 PM PDT by slapshot ("Were not gonna take it anymore" Twisted Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: slapshot

My bad slow server


8 posted on 05/19/2011 12:02:17 PM PDT by slapshot ("Were not gonna take it anymore" Twisted Sister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

YAY YAY YAY this man does not belong on the court. Such good news!!!!


9 posted on 05/19/2011 12:03:47 PM PDT by Persevero (Can not wait for 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slapshot

No problemo..that post is worth repeating 4 times...


10 posted on 05/19/2011 12:10:39 PM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey; slapshot

It’s a filibuster vote. It doesn’t matter if you vote NO, vote PRESENT, or simply don’t vote at all.

To break a filibuster, there has to be 60 YES votes. Any vote that is not a “YES” is a vote to block, even if you don’t vote at all.

My guess is Hatch, who has stood on principle that the constitution does not allow filibusters, probably figures voting “present” keeps his record on voting for a filibuster intact, while also signalling that he opposes the nominee. But it’s really a no vote.

My opinion is we have to filibuster as many judges as the left did to Bush, until it is “equal”. Then we should go back to never filibustering, because the president deserves to have his nominees get an up or down vote.

And if Bush had gotten votes on ALL of his nominees, it wouldn’t matter that Obama can slip some crazy judges in as well. THe problem is that there are so many vacancies because the democrats blocked the votes, and letting Obama appoint people to those judgeships just rewards the democrats.


11 posted on 05/19/2011 1:54:34 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates; fifedom; fwdude; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; JulieRNR21; ..

WE WON THIS ONE!!!!! Goodwin Liu was so radical, even Mark Kirk, Scott Brown, and the Maine Twins voted against him.


12 posted on 05/19/2011 3:23:58 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Muslims are a people of love, peace, and goodwill, and if you say that they aren't, they'll kill you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Thanks for the ping. Excellent. Now maybe the freaking Repubs will realize they don’t have to kowtow to Zero and his fellow leftists.


13 posted on 05/19/2011 3:45:25 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Shocking...postively shocking.


14 posted on 05/19/2011 3:45:34 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Perry/Bachmann 2012 - they can share hair care products.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Good news indeed. It’s still tragic that this is only the first one we were able to derail.


15 posted on 05/19/2011 3:53:05 PM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
It’s still tragic that this is only the first one we were able to derail.

But, if the bag limit was only one, this was the one to bag.

Word is that Liu was in line to be Obama's next Supreme Court nominee. In which case, he could've single-handedly destroyed the republic. With malice intent...

16 posted on 05/19/2011 3:59:31 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: okie01
But, if the bag limit was only one, this was the one to bag.

A Leftist is a Leftist, no matter where he is on the spectrum. He would be no more destructive on the US Supreme Court that the "Wise Latina" or the Anti-military "Dyke." The result would be the same.

Yes, I'm glad he was defeated. But there is just another anti-American Marxist in the wings - perhaps just a bit less provocative in order to pass RINO muster, but just as destructive.

17 posted on 05/19/2011 4:07:19 PM PDT by fwdude (Prosser wins, Goonions lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Thank God. I was terrified they would not block him.


18 posted on 05/19/2011 6:43:39 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

She will get what she deserves, as will we all.


19 posted on 05/19/2011 6:45:08 PM PDT by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Because he’s a RINO....!!!


20 posted on 05/19/2011 6:47:19 PM PDT by Osage Orange (The MSM is an enemy of the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson