Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

I’ve read quite a bit of positive info on thorium salt reactors. They’ve been around for decades. There has to be some serious drawbacks. I’ve read none (major). Nuclear energy is worldwide, someone should have had to taken that route by now. Strange. I feel I’m missing something regarding the drawbacks of an operational system.


5 posted on 05/22/2011 6:25:16 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: allmost

Two big drawbacks - engineering for molten-metal-coolant reactors of any kind is a b*tch, and (IIRC) there is no reprocessing.

Neither one is insurmountable, but the other thing is that without the uranium cycle reactors, you cannot make nuclear weapons.


11 posted on 05/22/2011 6:39:55 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: allmost

I am with you on that. I have been scratching my head.


22 posted on 05/22/2011 7:04:53 PM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: allmost
Nuclear energy is worldwide, someone should have had to taken that route by now. Strange. I feel I’m missing something regarding the drawbacks of an operational system.

Our orginal plants were designed to produce energy and also plutonium for nuclear weapons. If we just wanted energy, the thorium salt would have been the way to go.

35 posted on 05/23/2011 1:10:16 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast: THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson