Of course I’m parsing what she said. That’s how you tell the difference between what a politician says and what a politician means.
I am not opposed to a fence, to e-verify, and to allowing border patrol to do their jobs. If, as you claim, the majority of illegals will flee voluntarily than the cost of incarceration and deportation would be a fraction of what you are concerned about.
As far as where she has pushed amnesty one she stopped representing McCain, that was her position and she has not refuted it. It is not my responsibility as a voter to try and dig up a re-affirmation of her original pro-amnesty stance. It is her responsibility as a candidate to loudly and clearly refute such a stance.
Am I a retread? I am a conservative with loyalty to my country, and not to any political party. If the Republicans nominate a suitable candidate like Herman Cain (who supports deportation of illegals, not a path to citizenship for them), they will have earned my vote. If they nominate Sarah Palin - and she refutes her McCainish approach to amnesty - they will have earned my vote.
If they nominate someone who is going to print greencards for the 20-30 million people who snuck into the country, they will not.
2000
That was NOT her position. We have been through this in earlier posts. That was McCain's position and she had to parrot it.
See this is why I think you're a retread. You keep saying the same thing, even when proven wrong and you never answered if you're a banned retread. You're also a one issue hater. You found ONE issue in which to bash Palin and you're hanging on to it for dear life. Even when proven wrong.
It is on FR when you keep pushing that is now her stand without anything to back it up. You make a statement you have to prove it. You claim that's her current stand, prove it. Her later statements say differently.