Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

I would also like to see obscenity prosecuted again,someday. Pornography is a very harmful menace to millions of families,creating more sexual addicts and perverts than most drugs even. And it’s rarely talked about anymore in a lot of conservative circles.

If I’m not mistaken,aren’t the obscenity laws used to prosecute smut in the Nixon-era still on the books??? The inevitable judicial activism aside.


1,233 posted on 05/29/2011 2:15:42 PM PDT by madmaximus (Liberaltarians=junkies,anti-semites,anti-military,cultural marxists without all the taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1232 | View Replies ]


To: madmaximus
You would have to convince people that society has coarsened. It has but a lot of people let the "F" word fly. Often. And in public. The 60's did us no favors.

I don't know about smut laws. We are bombarded by garbage daily on TV. (Well I'm not. Don't have TV anymore) It would be a fight.

1,234 posted on 05/29/2011 2:21:55 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies ]

To: madmaximus

The obscenity laws are still on the books. The obscenity laws haven’t changed since the early 70s. What has changed is that juries no longer convict.

I sat on a jury a few years ago, during an obscenity trial. The material was truly gross and disgusting, but most people’s attitude was - no children are involved, so those who don’t want to watch it don’t have to watch it. A non-guilty verdict was reached in less than half an hour.

“Libertarianism” writ large...


1,237 posted on 05/29/2011 2:39:28 PM PDT by friendly_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson