The only question I have is: Who is voicing any of these views here? I haven’t seen a Romney, Guiliani or Huckster booster here since 2008...and few even then. There’s a legion of Palin followers here and a smattering of Herman Cain fans. Beyond that, I haven’t seen any candidate boosterism whatsoever.
Nor have a seen any agitation for homosexual (I don’t use the term “gay”) rights or abortion. So I’m wondering who this is directed at.
Hank
I haven’t seen a Romney, Guiliani or Huckster booster here since 2008...and few even then.
_________________________________________
Then you havent been looking
The RomneyBots never left
They are in full bloom right now
and ready for the cutting...
You must not read many of the threads, I see them a lot, and countless times since 2008, I have also seen dozens of zots because of them, including some yesterday.
Many of the most hard core have switched from pushing their candidate to clearing the field for him, mostly by trolling against Palin, many of them simply went dormant since 2008, waiting for the proper time this cycle to re energize their accounts.
Here is a post to me from yesterday labeling me a “jerk”, “clueless” and a “rat operative” for opposing Mitt Romney.
>”Romney may have been a one term governor of MA. The fact he was a one term governor of that state speaks volumes ... this piss ant state of low life ‘Rats (i.e., Barney Frank)couldn’t handle it. Romney went on to head up the SLC (Utah) Olympics ... the venue was falling apart and they needed strong leadership ... Romney was hired to bail them out and he did a superb job. Olympic committee’s to this day are using the Romney formula. Romney without question is the most qualified candidate the pubbies have for the presidential slate ... all you jerks bad mouthing Romney are clueless ... or worse yet ‘rat operatives.”<