If she does run will it survive. My only point was this article was written entirely because Krauthammer had criticism for Palin. That’s the author’s entire ‘evidence’ that Krauthammer not a ‘real’ conservative.
WE ARE NOT THE LEFT. Our candidates should be fully challenged and vetted.
Palin was vetted, by Culvahouse no less, and he said she “knocked it out of the park.” McCain chose her over 25 others probably including Romney. She should be called, “The vetted one.”
Others have posted here all the evidence needed to prove that Krauthammer is satisfied with moderate conservatives. (read: RINOs)
Krauthammer et al need to stop using shorthand when they talks about Palin.
I hear the “not a policy wonk,” “needs to study” and the like, and that is fine, but it is too general. I would like them to offer specific cases they think illustrate her lack of knowledge or ability. As it is, Kraut, Rove and Will might as well be 5th graders submitting their “Sarah Palin Would Be a Bad President Because...” papers. Nothing but baldfaced declarations with no supporting evidence. No footnotes.
She puts out enough material just on facebook that deconstructing her ought to be relatively easy if she is such a dunce.
And that is my problem with the solons: It is not as if they disagree with her policy positions-or at least they rarely address her policy positions.
If they can take a mutt like Jon Huntsman seriously, there is no reason they cannot do the same with Palin.