Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin pulling out the stops (GOP miffed on Mitt’s big day)
Boston Herald ^ | June 2, 1011 | Hillary Chabot

Posted on 06/02/2011 2:47:07 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

GOP megastar Sarah Palin’s bus tour rumbled toward the Hub last night, driving into a Republican Party furor as her headline-grabbing East Coast trip threatened to overshadow today’s presidential announcement by party front-runner Mitt Romney.

“She will certainly be in New Hampshire to rain on Mitt’s parade,” wrote Massachusetts GOP spokesman Tim Buckley in an e-mail obtained by the Herald. Bay State GOP officials confirmed yesterday that Buckley wrote the e-mail, but said it was a private exchange and not an official communication.

“I guess she blew in with the storm,” sniffed state House minority leader Bradley H. Jones (R-North Reading) yesterday, a longtime Romney supporter. “She may generate a lot of attention, but given the choice between seeing Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney, I’d much rather see Romney.”

[snip]

“It is becoming more and more clear to people that this is about Sarah and her brand and not a presidential campaign,” said one Romney consultant, who added, “She’s not making any friends within the political communities. If you cared about things like delegates and primaries, I think you’d be a little more attentive.”

Still, the rogue road trip put Palin back in the national spotlight, said Steve Duprey, a national Republican committeeman in New Hampshire whose wife volunteers for Romney but who said he is neutral in the race.

“Simply by putting her family in a bus and touring around the country she’s generating more media attention than most candidates,” Duprey said. “All the discussions before were about other candidates. She’s changed the conversation just by getting on a bus.”

Meanwhile, Romney kept a relatively low profile yesterday, quietly tweeting last night: “Big day tomorrow. Join my @livestream event as I announce my candidacy for President in New Hampshire.”

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2012; fnc; foxnews; goingrogue; gop; massachusetts; newhampshire; nicollewallace; onenation; palin; palinnation; rnc; romney; romneyspew; sarahpalin; steveduprey; sweetrevenge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last
To: misharu

That is my plan.


81 posted on 06/02/2011 5:53:55 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Well we sure want you to be enthralled, Dude...

Tingly, even.

82 posted on 06/02/2011 5:56:34 AM PDT by gogeo (Palin/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Romney ... Romney ... that name rings a bell, faintly ... Oh, I remember, that dozy fellow with the hair like John Edwards. The one who put his dog on the car roof, that Yankeefied goofball with the socialized medicine program.

I think he was running for office, but he wasn’t on my primary ballot in 2008, so I couldn’t have voted for him.


83 posted on 06/02/2011 5:58:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Oh most loving Father, preserve us from faithless fears and worldly anxieties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

Compare and contrast with Palin, Demint, Bachmann.


84 posted on 06/02/2011 5:59:33 AM PDT by gogeo (Palin/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
....A third party may be the only vehicle to get us where we want to go.

Having parties split up gives countries "leaders" like Hugo Chavez. No thank you! We rebuild. Reagan wasn't anointed. Reagan loved America and ran a hell of a campaign -- with a lot of opposition from his party and was hated by the msm. Yet he won in a landslide.

I'm through being swayed or having doubts dropped into my thinking. Conservatism is the majority thinking in the U.S.A. The Republican Party can be the conservative party again -- but it won't be unless WE make it happen. If we don't stand behind and PUSH our elected officials, they will not listen and/or lose focus (unfortunately elected office has become a "profession"). A lot of them are getting the message but it is our obligation to remember that it is WE THE PEOPLE who govern and so we must be willing to do the heavy lifting and not walk away.

85 posted on 06/02/2011 6:00:25 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Donald Rumsfeld Fan

I haven’t seen that before. This video should go viral, especially today. Hysterical!


86 posted on 06/02/2011 6:11:01 AM PDT by ne1410s (Psalm 109:8 May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Far be it from me to tell you how to use your vote, but as Rush says, if there’s going to be a third party, it’ll be the GOP.

And by this I believe Rush means, a winning conservative GOP (Republican Party). I'm with him.

87 posted on 06/02/2011 6:14:26 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Perot ran 3rd party against Bush not Clinton.
Bush lost - Clinton won.

In this case, if Sarah ran 3rd party she’d be running against Obama. And Obama would lose and I think the GOP would too.

In 1992 there was no alternative media, no cell phones, texting, internet, tweeting, YouTube, Facebook, blogging, or TeaParty movement. The climate is different. The players are different. The message is different. Our problems are different.

I think 2012 will be Alaskan vs Hawaiian. American vs Globalist. Family vs State. Freedom vs Control. Prosperity vs Austerity.

America has a big choice to make. Freedom or Bondage to Government.


88 posted on 06/02/2011 6:15:34 AM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
“It is becoming more and more clear to people that this is about Sarah and her brand and not a presidential campaign,”

Oh, dear! I guess Sarah is not really running. It's now been confirmed for us more than a hundred times now by the far left: the Obama Regime, the Romney Camp, and the Mainstream Media. We might as well go home and stop paying attention to her. Right?

89 posted on 06/02/2011 6:18:42 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The quotes from the Massachusetts Republicans show just how petulant and disconnected the GOP truly is. I hope the voters show up in numbers that make is VERY clear that Sarah is preferred by the people... and THEN maybe (MAYBE) the GOP will figure out that their future as a party is on the line. We do not care one whit about the political establishment. We need leadership, and the GOP has failed to provide any in decades. The GOP precinct chairmen can go rot in a corner. A simple internet tweet can do more for a candidate than they have done in many years.

Sadly, the entrenched GOP did not figure it out in 1992, 1996, 2006 or 2008... and they unconscionably failed to do what was needed when they had all 3 Houses for SIX years, after 2000, 2002, and 2004. The entrenched GOP is just as big an obstacle to Freedom as the MSM. Sadly, we may have to have another 4 years of Obama for enough dedicated GOP voters (many of whom are here on FR) to figure this out.

90 posted on 06/02/2011 6:18:58 AM PDT by Teacher317 (really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
.....The level of corruption and self-serving in the party structure is obvious to any reasonable observer. Cleaning out a state party, as she undertook in Alaska, is one level of challenge. It may be impractical to impossible to attempt to do so on a national level with 50 separate structures.....

They did it in Wisconsin! If they did it there they can do it anywhere!

91 posted on 06/02/2011 6:22:00 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Palin is a fighter.
You gotta love the fact that she is taking it right to the candidate and his team responsible for so many dirty tricks in the last primary...and on his own turf!

I want a fighter like that as my president.
That’s what this country needs.


92 posted on 06/02/2011 6:27:28 AM PDT by sillsfan (Reagan and Sarah are right- WE win, they lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: carmody
In this case, if Sarah ran 3rd party she’d be running against Obama. And Obama would lose and I think the GOP would too.

Like the 3-way special election that we just lost in New York?

93 posted on 06/02/2011 6:27:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
"With Palin in it there really is no competition with Bachman."

But Michelle would make a great Attorney General for President Palin.

94 posted on 06/02/2011 6:30:33 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Having parties split up gives countries "leaders" like Hugo Chavez. No thank you! We rebuild. Reagan wasn't anointed. Reagan loved America and ran a hell of a campaign -- with a lot of opposition from his party and was hated by the msm. Yet he won in a landslide...

As I said, cleaning out the national party is a challenge several magnitudes greater than a single state party.

Even Reagan was not able to do so.

Practically speaking, it will require not just new bodies in national positions, but removing entrenched RINOcrats in places such as Massachusetts, New York, the entire West Coast...how many places in between?

It will require removing the political chameleons from office and party positions...those who have mastered the art of swaying and bending with the wind...those who talk like Reagan when a Reagan is in power, but when he's not, produce things like "Gangs du Jour" and "Chameleon-Kennedy" legislation.

This Bradley Huntington-Smythe quoted in the article, for example...how much dynamite would be required to remove him from his position? How many Bradleys across the country, how much dynamite?

What are the odds of that? I'd seriously like to hear your well reasoned answer.

95 posted on 06/02/2011 6:30:54 AM PDT by gogeo (Palin/Bachmann 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"As for the oft mentioned rap about leaving the governorship in Alaska..."

Compared to the seldom- mentioned fact that BH resigned as US Senator.

96 posted on 06/02/2011 6:34:59 AM PDT by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Aw. poor babies, why I read just this morning that Romney is going on a nationwide tour. I ask you now, where oh where would he get such an idea?


97 posted on 06/02/2011 6:35:08 AM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Palin certainly can go tweet to tweet with Obama. After watching the protesters in Wisconsin using their electronic gadgets (from union goons to brainwashed high school students), it’s obvious we need to do battle there and have someone who is adept at it. I believe Palin also knows the value of “celebrity” and how the public gravitates toward it (and why she uses her talent in that arena). Couple all of her skills and add them to her heartfelt convictions and it’s easy to see why the Left hates her and will do anything to destroy her candidacy and our best chance to take the White House.


98 posted on 06/02/2011 6:36:53 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: OldEagle
Compared to the seldom- mentioned fact that BH resigned as US Senator.

Great point!

99 posted on 06/02/2011 6:38:10 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: All

When deciding the character of a candidate, I do pay attention to tactics. Reagan said the 11th commandment was to speak no ill of fellow Republicans.

What has Mitt Romney permitted, if not directed? He has mounted a smear campaign against Palin.

Is this the kind of administration we want in Washington? DO we want an underhanded conniving power-hungry person who tears down others? Or do we want someone who has a track record of rooting out corruption without trashing the opposition needlessly, as Palin does.

Romney’s character is displayed for all to see, and it would be a shame not to recognize him for what he is.


100 posted on 06/02/2011 6:38:25 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota (Which are you? A producer, a looter, or a moocher of wealth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson