Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Farmer Dean

I would support a system where one candidate had to get 50% + 1 votes. If no candidate was able to, then there would be a runoff between the top two.

What REALLY sucks is our insane method of selecting our candidate. I would prefer a single day when ALL the candidates were voted on by ALL the states.


12 posted on 06/03/2011 7:33:12 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Blood of Tyrants

“I would support a system where one candidate had to get 50% + 1 votes. If no candidate was able to, then there would be a runoff between the top two.”

NO! That system would succeed in allowing the large population centers to select our leaders. Since they are overwhelmingly Democrat, they would succeed in defeating the votes of flyover country which is overwhelmingly conservative!


63 posted on 06/03/2011 8:42:04 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I would prefer a single day when ALL the candidates were voted on by ALL the states.

The Electoral College used to do just that. The Electors represented the States, not some candidate.

135 posted on 06/04/2011 3:19:58 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson