“First comment in on Gawker already trotting out the Liberal double standard with:
“He’s not a sexual hypocrite — policywise, he’s an advocate for sexual liberation. So what is the story here? “
Uh, policy wise he did write internet sexual predator legislation, and he’s saying he doesn’t know if any of the girls he sent pictures to were under age.”
—Yep. Plus, there’s the fact that- regardless of what the Libs say, there *is* a “moral” code for the Left (in the form of political correctness).
When Allen West hung out with some biker group right before the election, (a group which apparently put out some kind of magazine with scantily dressed women posing near bikes) Debbie Waserman-Schultz said it was “exploitative” of women, and held a protest out his campaign headquarters. What Weiner has done is far, far beyond any of that... yet, she has said absolutely squat about this.
That has to be the Dems biggest fear. Don’t you know the tabloids and blogs are investigating the heck out of this to try to identify underage girls who twittered with @repweiner. They will contact the parents and offer money if the girl will come forward and play the victim and provide evidence.
Parents, “let me make sure I understand you, you will give me the money to send my daughter to college for four years?”
I would not want to bank on the above scenario not happening if I were the Dem leadership. The guy who championed child protection laws for the internet turns out to be a predator. That would be a target rich environment indeed.