Replies

Kind of slow...I’ve already looked, been looking, will continue to look...and the only one I’ve seen with a CLEAR RECORD of having done what she said she would do, who operates independently of the majority of republicans and has taken the policy lead for going on two years now.

Sarah endorsed Perry, as opposed to Hutchison for pete’s sakes and as opposed to Bill White! She took the lead to keep those two out of the running! She SUCCEEDED!

Palin endorsed McCain in an election he already had bagged...and now she doesn’t owe McCain a damned thing...in fact now he owes her and doesn’t dare pull his KRAP! She has SUCCEEDED in cornering him! He can’t now come back and say she’s not competent, now can he?

Your problem, seems to be that you want to overlook her in favor of some she/man establishment type...rather than see her as a viable candidate.

Even Huckabuck and Newt know they can’t compete... Pawlenty’s mea culpa on cap ‘n trade was not the defining moment for him the establishment thought it would be. Yet you want to discount that? And call it a slight flaw? Not to mention Pawlenty is a dullard who couldn’t inspire a chicken to pluck up a june bug, even.

Besides, there’s not one thing wrong with us all seeing the clear candidate we to succeed and backing her with the full force of our support. This bull krap about ooooo..oooo we must be careful...ooooo...oooo we need to check out everybody....oooo...ooooo...we want somebody who can win...ooooo....this...ooooo....that. We’ve been watching this closely for going on over two years yet. Why should we wait, just because others want to eyeball all the she/male republicans and RINO’s. Would be a shame wouldn’t it, if republicans united behind the one clear true conservative candidate and pushed her to run and win it, wouldn’t it?

Sarah endorsed Perry, as opposed to Hutchison for pete’s sakes and as opposed to Bill White!
###

She endorsed him instead of Deb Medina the only conservative in the race. Medina was raising in the polls until Sarah endorsed Perry instead of her.

Sarah made a mistake doing that. I never understood why she did it.

I look at competence, conservatism, and electability, the best combination of all three points, on balance. And as I look at the field of possible candidates, no one stands out, head and shoulders, above all the rest. Some are stronger on one or two points, but weaker on another. I could make a case for several. I could make a case against them all.

At this moment, my top tier would be Pawlenty, Perry, and Palin, in that order. My next tier wsould be Santorum, Bachmann, and Cain. If DeMint got in, he would move immediately into the top group. Romney, Paul, Gingrich, Johnson--no.

Between now and the Missouri primary, I will narrow down my field further. Whichever ends up being the Republican candidate, I will most likely support.