Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Batrachian

Then, by extension, a “single-issue” platform like the NRA’s would be similarly stupid. The NRA cannot endorse a Democrat because of what they might do on other issues, so that would negate the single-issue platform and concept.

But, the NRA IS a single-issue organization. Hedging their endorsements on other issues is simply foolish. The endorsement of the NRA should mean SOMETHING, other than a de-facto RNC stamp of approval.


58 posted on 06/13/2011 11:57:28 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE
"Then, by extension, a “single-issue” platform like the NRA’s would be similarly stupid. The NRA cannot endorse a Democrat because of what they might do on other issues, so that would negate the single-issue platform and concept.

But, the NRA IS a single-issue organization. Hedging their endorsements on other issues is simply foolish. The endorsement of the NRA should mean SOMETHING, other than a de-facto RNC stamp of approval."

You're mistaken if you think the NRA only lobbies on gun legislation. They lobbied very prominently against McCain/Feingold, and rightfully so, but that blows your point out of the water. Also, withholding endorsements of Democrats does not make them a rubber stamp for the Republican party, since they can withhold those endorsements as well. Endorsing Democrats who are good on guns only strengthens the Democratic Party since those candidates can and do support their party on most other things, such as ObamaCare. A national organization has to have a wider strategy than just thinking about a single candidate.

68 posted on 06/14/2011 2:56:08 PM PDT by Batrachian (Prepare for four more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson