Please read my post #36.
Those who are “correcting” me when I said it wasn’t “too close” are not looking at the words “too close” of an election in the same way I am looking at it. I am not saying it was one sided or lopsided or any such thing. I was thinking of it as a clear win, not controversial.
Does anyone remember Florida in 2000? Or recounts where the GOP always lose, such as in the state of Washington and in the state of Minnesota, and where the vote is controversial and razor thin?
Obviously I was not clear in what I meant, and gave several of you a fun day of jumping on what I wrote. As my post #36 points out, conservatives in Wisconsin were bragging about a 12,000 vote victory in the Supreme Court race.
But I will give you this...you have the right to define “too close” anyway you want.
But so do I.
I remember being shocked, shocked that Obama won NC at all, and by a clear vote, back when it happened. So to me, I did not think of it as one of those nailbiters that go down in electoral history. That stuck with me, although I did not remember the exact number of 12,000.
Again, there was no need for a recount, that’s why you don’t remember it as being a nail biter.
If North Carolina had been the State to determine the Presidency, such as Florida in 2000, it would have been as widely remembered.
But it wasn’t. It was a “clear result” only due to the fact that there was no recount. It was a razor thin win, just like Missouri was a razor thin loss for him.
What you are going off of is the fact that there was no recount.
OK, here’s the only way voter fraud can be really stopped. It is up all concerned citizens to become involved locally and become election workers and election judges, thus being able to be there personally when the votes are counted, blocking the vote-stealers from getting away with their nefarious plan,