[Jim Scott]

Apparently the NRA no longer supports conservative politicians. Because I’m not a gun owner (but fully support the Second Amendment) I can’t be sure but judging from it’s backing of Harry Reid and Mitt Romney, the NRA doesn’t appear to care much about the folks (gun owners) it purports to represent. If that is the case, why does the NRA even exist - and why do gun owners bother to pay good money ($35. annually) to join the NRA?

[Old Teufel Hunden]

"but judging from it’s backing of Harry Reid and Mitt Romney"

Read my post 31 to Gator113 for the first assertion. As for the second one, the VP of the NRA talking about Mitt Romney does not automatically extend to the whole NRA. Don't cast aspersions on the NRA for one statemet by a VP. I'm not going to cast aspersions on FreeRepublic or think badly of them because a few freepers may be idiots, right? You should follow the same logic with the NRA.