Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog
One interesting fact which I am sure most people would never guess is that casualties were just about identical for both armies. In fact the best sources show the Confederacy lost just a tad less than the Union,

Lincoln knew that given enough battles with equal or even higher Union losses the Union would still win the war. He called this: "the terrible arithmetic". The Confederate white population was less than 6 million. There were 22 million in the North. There was never really any doubt which side would win the war if the Union remained determined to keep fighting.

20 posted on 06/17/2011 5:14:32 PM PDT by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Upstate NY Guy

Taken as a whole, actual combat deaths for either side cannot be compared to the much greater death toll attributed to disease etc. But in combat causalities, the North suffered many more than the South.

The NRA of today was birthed in 1871 as a direct response to faults which arose during the civil war. In that war, as a whole, the superior marksmanship of the average Confederate troops (more rural) was far superior to those of the Union Army. (more urban)

In battles of the western campaigns, the rural western army troops of both sides were much more evenly matched as to having a lifelong familiarity with firearms and being accurate with same, and the causality ratios reflected this.

The NRA’s purpose was to correct that acknowledged accuracy imbalance of the civil war, to encourage and teach marksmanship for all American civilians, especially the young.

http://www.nrahq.org/history.asp


23 posted on 06/17/2011 6:03:24 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson