Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

Actually, I think that nuke plant was already shut down for refueling, but obviously, they don’t want flood water getting in there, mainly due to the stored radioactive waste, which still requires cooling, etc.


2 posted on 06/18/2011 9:57:45 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog
Actually, I think that nuke plant was already shut down for refueling, but obviously, they don’t want flood water getting in there, mainly due to the stored radioactive waste, which still requires cooling, etc.

Yep, they shut it down in April. The refueling/maintenance period was scheduled (according to news articles from April) to end on or about June 21st, but now they're going to wait out the flooding before bringing it back online.

But yeah, it's kinda hard to melt down a reactor that's in a state of cold shutdown. Sounds like they're in pretty good shape; weeks to prepare and they say they can handle at least another 10ft increase in water levels.
3 posted on 06/18/2011 10:06:42 AM PDT by verum ago (A liberal's mind is like a single action revolver with a bobbed hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson