from what this article says, it reads like the law was meant more than anything to protect ccw holders from ‘law enforcement’ in areas LEO’s look for any miniscule technical thing to charge ccw holders with.
“....from what this article says, it reads like the law was meant more than anything to protect ccw holders from ‘law enforcement’ in areas LEO’s look for any miniscule technical thing to charge ccw holders with....”
Exactly. And the governor signed the bill put before him, which was an improvement to existing law. If it’s not perfect, it’s not on him. People tend to read these things as if the governors write these laws from their dreams. They rarely do. They are the product of a legislative process.
That’s the way I see it. To an anti-gun right LEO, even mentioning the fact you’re carrying would constitute brandishment.