Well, Justice Thomas disagrees with you. The majority opinion states that the law is unconstituational because it violates the First Amendment rights of minors. It’s written right there in plain language. Justice Thomas’ dissent is based on the fact that our Founders did not mean children to have free speech (or access to free speech) outside of their parent’s influence.
I don’t believe that it’s my emotion that’s preventing this debate. It’s your apparent inability to read and understand English. Given that Free Republic is a text driven forum, I agree that debate with you is probably not going to be productive. Try reading the opinion again and see if you can reason it out.
Yet the vast majority of the justices agree with me,
That’s twice that you’ve resorted to personal insults. That’s a technique used by those with an inability to defend a weak argument (and something I’d expect to see from a liberal), and is why I have absolutely no interest in a continued conversation with you.
You might ask yourself what is it about your personality that leads you to insult some individual, about whom you know nothing, on an internet forum. I wonder if you would be so bold were we face to face.