Emily Good to sue Rochester Police Department (videotape at traffic stop)

WHEC.com ^ | 6/28/11 | Ray Levato

[Lazamataz]

Hey, all I wanna know out of you, is do you agree to the terms finalized in #81?

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>Maybe because those people were actually standing in the woman’s yard and not within a few feet of the police action?<<

Within a few feet? I hate to tell you this, but all anybody has to do is watch the original video to see how full of crap you are.

Have a nice day!

[Balding_Eagle]

I think you’re jumping the gun a bit, SD hasn’t really agreed to anything.

Read his posts, he looks scared to come right out and agree, so he’s just sort-of, maybe, perhaps, onboard. Unless things go the way they’re going to go and even he can’t deny that he looses, then, no deal.

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

If city officials can have surveillance (and they are planning on it) on the people, then the reverse holds true as well...

[Emperor Palpatine]

"....who intentionally went out of her way to incite the officer.."


And just what proof do you have to support such an assertion? Except perhaps in your Wolkenkuckucksheim......

[Slambat]

You are right on the money. If they do nothing wrong
what do they have to be afraid of. Still, standing too
close to police action can be hazardous.

[Lazamataz]

I think you’re jumping the gun a bit, SD hasn’t really agreed to anything.

True dat. Heck, he tried to throw something in there about "Well, if I lose, then we wait until an Appeal".... LOL... doesn't sound too confident after all......

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>With each point/counterpoint, this lady destroyed this thig cops arguments...

Cop: go inside...

Lady: This is my yard, I have a right to stand in my yard...

Cop: I don’t feel safe...

Lady: Look at me, how do I threaten you?<<

Yes, the officer had to act like Johnny Badass, and no way was this barefoot woman in her pajamas going to defy his “ORDERS.”

He couldn’t face the truth, and was humiliated in public. So to save face, instead of admitting the woman was right, he lashed out.

He reminds me a lot of SoldierDad.

[SoldierDad]

Oh, yes. Please accept the postion of those who support this liberal POS who went looking for trouble so she could file this suit. You have no evidence the woman DIDN’T make any comments or statements to the officer, but you’ll run with that lack of evidence anyway. Incredible.

[Emperor Palpatine]

Finally some common sense. Too bad more cops aren’t like you. Perhaps many wouldn’t have lost such respect for the profession if they were.

Thank you for that, sir.

[SoldierDad]

Nice job of taking the incident completely out of context and ignoring the totality of the incident. Amazing.

[Emperor Palpatine]

Again. she was on her property.

All else is irrelevant.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

“Fraidy-Cop” LOL

[PalmettoMason]

You have no evidence the woman DIDN’T make any comments or statements to the officer, but you’ll run with that lack of evidence anyway. Incredible.

Hmmmm... guilty until proven innocent. A peek inside the mind of a statist. Incredible.

[SoldierDad]

No, if there is an appeal, we wait for the outcome. Sorry, that’s the offer.

[Emperor Palpatine]

Hey Sparky...she was standing in her yard, too.

A point you so conveniently fail to address and completely ignore.

[SoldierDad]

That cuts both ways, you know.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>You have no evidence the woman DIDN’T make any comments or statements to the officer, but you’ll run with that lack of evidence anyway.<<

That one is so out there, I thought I’d repost it to make sure I’m not “imagining” you just said that.

[PalmettoMason]

That cuts both ways, you know.

Horse pukey. No one is alleging the cop did anything that is not on tape.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>Hey Sparky...she was standing in her yard, too.<<

I pointed that out to SD on another thread, and he called me a liar. Seriously.