My claim still stands even if I don’t have the time to be your errand boy.
You know that if most of the hydrogen gas remains, then it cannot be the chemical reaction that you claim. You also know that such a chemical reaction could not work for 12 months like Rossi is claiming in my last post. You have enough information to discard your own chemical reaction claim.
As far as I’m concerned, even if this DOES prove to be just a chemical reaction, then all the better. We won’t have the NRC regulating it. It’s still efficient, relatively clean energy.
If it's a chemical reaction, where does the copper come from?
(sorry)
If it’s a chemical reaction, where does the copper come from?