BTW, I don’t see why you act so da*ned defensive on this subject; I basically said I agreed with the article — except for that single-character anomaly. Now that I admit to my misreading of that single character, what is your beef?
***I have no beef, I was not defensive, and I wasn’t even sarcastic. It’s a straightforward sentence countering your criticism...
“That’s not 1=0, it is “L”, l=0, when you copy from PDF there are tons of artifacts.”
Perhaps you are targeting my other responses to other posts? Elsewhere I will admit to having beef, being defensive, engaging in sarcasm as well as promoting rational discussion, even all at the same time.
"Naysaying criticism" -- not exactly conducive to further discussion...