[dragnet2]

Not me. I'm not that interested in this particular case. Besides, I already know what prompted their decision. No enough hard evidence for murder.

Regardless of what anyone thinks, clearly there was reasonable doubt in their minds.

End of story.

[erlayman]

I agree.

Something went very wrong the day Caylee died.
For Caylee to have been missing for as long as she was before even her grandmother reported reveals a very weird story.
From what I have read and heard Casey and her mother had seen each other more than once after the child’s death and prior to the grandmother reporting it.

Do I think that Casey did it by herself? Not sure but she had a hand in it.

Do I think there is more to it than just Casey? YES

Do I think that just maybe one or more of her parents know more than they are telling? YES.
Just my 2 cents.

So at the very least she should have been convicted of neglect and failing to protect her daughter which I believe was what count # 3 was.For the jury to decide that she didn’t have anything to do with Caylee death was a blatant miscarriage of justice.IMO.