Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975

Brits must look at this differently than we do. Conscientious objector status isn’t uncommon among those in the medical services in our military.


9 posted on 07/06/2011 1:20:02 AM PDT by Melas (Sent via Galaxy Tab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Melas
Conscientious objector status isn’t uncommon among those in the medical services in our military.

Odd that those who refuse to use a 'gun' to kill because of the Hippocratic Oath don't seem to mind using a pair of scissors and a vacuum cleaner to kill babies in the womb, or approving of other doctor's doing so.

16 posted on 07/06/2011 1:36:02 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Melas

When there is conscription in place, the British military does allow for genuine conscientious objectors to serve in non-combatant positions. This has been the case since World War II (technically since World War I, actually, but the World War II system was much more effective and organised).

But at times when joining is completely voluntary as it is now, the situation is different. The position is that a conscientious objector simply should not join the military.

There is a procedure in place for somebody who becomes a conscientious objector after they joined to continue to serve, but they have to convince a panel that their change of heart is genuine. In the case of this man, it was decided that it was not.


18 posted on 07/06/2011 1:48:14 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson