Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ransomed

the homosexual organizations are very rich and powerful, big corporate donors like Home Depot, Budweiser, ford Foundation, the Haas Foundation (Levi-Strauss money) -— and on and on. Hundreds, maybe thousands, of big and little organizations from gay rodeo to gay AA.
Woud love to see where all this money is going. They are lobbying in every state capitol as we speak.

Millions in donations pays for a lot of full-time activists. But I don’t think they’re going to get ‘r done.

they are only 3% of the population.


24 posted on 07/12/2011 11:32:36 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: squarebarb

I voted for the marriage amendment in my state, and would do so again, but I don’t think it is going to matter eventually. The sooner folks start looking to their faiths to define marriage instead of the ever devolving versions of the statists and homosexualists, the better off the institution will be, in my opinion.

“they are only 3% of the population.”

I wouldn’t be shocked if it was even less than that. Statists and homosexualists love that many are conditioned to think that marriage is just a collection of rights and obligations from the state that can be granted, enforced, severed and resumed as long as the state gives its permission. They know if marriage is merely viewed as a contract that applies between any people the gov’t deems it does, then there is no real reason not to accept impossibilities like “gay marriage”, considering the cohabitation and sodomy laws aren’t enforced anymore.

Freegards


25 posted on 07/12/2011 11:51:32 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: squarebarb
It's true that probably less than 2% of the population is gay, but he majority of heterosexuals support a form of marriage which has already been redefined almost past recognition, whose core meanings have already been abandoned.

Marriage of its essence is exclusive, lifelong, and fertile, and defined by sexual union.

"Exclusive" was abandoned when premarital copulation, at least for singles in their 20's, became the "new norm."

"Lifelong" was abandoned via divorce.

"Fertile" was abandoned via contraception, sterilization and abortion. That's three out of four.

Oh, and "sexual union"? That's what's being abandoned now, since whatever two women or two men do together with their genitals, it isn't sexual union. By definition: It does not unite the sexes. It's not the marital act, the defining act of consummating marriage.

So it's heterosexuals --- maybe not me, and maybe not you, but heterosexuals in general --- who knocked out 3 out of 4 components of the definition of marriage.

Straight people queered the norm. So-called "gay marriage" is not the cause of the redefinition of marriage, but the result.

28 posted on 07/12/2011 12:26:35 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The first duty of intelligent men of our day is the restatement of the obvious. " - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: squarebarb

They aren’t even 3%, more like 1%.

But the left, not too long ago, started their “project 10”, which was an attempt to push the lie that 10% of the population is gay.

It’s a technique called “jamming”, and it’s used all over the media. Make it look like their numbers are much more than they are, make sure nothing negative is shown, make sure that if there is only going to be one “normal” or “good” person in a story, that it’s a homosexual.

Others have seen this technique, I’m sure.


29 posted on 07/12/2011 12:32:18 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson