As hard as it is to say, I think they did their job.
- - - -
Their job was to look at the evidence without bias. From what I am hearing them say they failed to do that therefore they did not do their job.
I agree with you. All 12 jurors and the alt jurors got it wrong.
[[Their job was to look at the evidence without bias. From what I am hearing them say they failed to do that therefore they did not do their job.]]
They absolutely DID fail to do so without bias- one juror after another has stated that they ‘couldn’t vote guilty to murder’ becvause ‘they didn’t think she hsould get the death penalty’- and that was NOT their job to determine what the punishement should be- they were baised by their predjudice for penalty as they made their descions on guilt or innocence- they even voted AGAINST their own consciences KNOWING in the hearts that she was ‘guilty of something’ as they have clearly stated over and over again- and my question to htem is IF they fewel she was ‘guilty of something’ then doesn’t that mean the prosecution did their job in presenting enough ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ evidence to convince them that she was involved in the death and coverup of the death of her daughter? IF the prosecution hadn’t doen an effective job, then they wouldn’t have a clue or even a gut feelign about who the murderer could be- but nope- they were all pretty convinced she was ‘guilty of something’ (and they know damn well what that ‘something’ is bewcause the prosecutuion did an excellent job of presenting neough evidence to show that casey, and ONLY casey, had the motive to to kill her daughter wheteher she ‘meant to or not’. At hte very least- there was more than enough evidence to show criminally aggravated manslaughter - but htis moronic jury allowed their BIAS to rule their judgements, and now htis freak is free o nthe streets somewhere and apparently ‘wants more children’? (with NO mention of her dead child, as though ‘woops, Caley is gone- oh well, I’ll just pop some more out- easy come, easy go’)
Yes, I think we have a good judicial system, HOWEVER, its a VERY scary thought to think that these same twelve idiots could have, or even might someday, be the jury for someone who is truly innocent, and they are so innept and unqualified to sit in judgement, that that innocent person could be executed because they FAILED to do their duty and ‘listen to the evidence WITHOUT bias’ They demonstated that theyu werre NOT capable of listenign ot evidence WITHOUT bias- Hell- they were ready to convict George anothony if they could have, DESPITE the fact that that ONLY casey had motive