Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeltz25

Its not a good deal. None of them are. Current congress can’t bind a future congress. So any cut in spending over 10 years is irrelevant.


23 posted on 07/21/2011 1:41:23 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

that’s why I said we’d need to see the details. If it’s only like 50B next year and it’s all backloaded 5-10 yrs down the road, I’d agree with you.

But if there are significant cuts next year it could be good.

I’m sure both of us would love to see 1T in cuts next year and balance the budget but we both know that won’t happen.

And I was being relative. That it’s a better deal than some of the others out there.


40 posted on 07/21/2011 1:57:52 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson