[Always A Marine]

"A deadly bombing that killed at least seven in Oslo on Friday can be viewed as a response to Norway's participation in NATO-led military campaign against Libya, Russian top political experts said."

If true, the bombing (not the unrelated shootings) was a legitimate retaliation against a belligerent government. Without provocation, NATO has been doing the very same thing to the sovereign government of Libya. Has anyone ever adequately explained why we are so intent on turning Libya over to a disorganized bands of ragtag rebels?

Only one explanation makes sense. Libya possesses huge stocks of gold, and was on the verge of creating a Gold Dinar as the new medium of exchange for oil. For that, we are bombing Libya's government, and it wouldn't surprise me if "the West" soon resorts to a ground invasion to prevent the trading of oil with a stable, gold-based currency.

[Psalm 144]

“...[I]t wouldn’t surprise me if “the West” soon resorts to a ground invasion to prevent the trading of oil with a stable, gold-based currency.”

A supreme irony that Western European colonialism in Africa gets revitalized under Barack Hussein Obama.

[Tailgunner Joe]

Kadaffy is not the sovereign government of Libya. He is a tyrant who seized power by force and rules by force. He holds no legitimate constitutional office. He who lives by the sword shall die by the sword.