Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ngat

“You are correct. No agreement to bind a future congress to cutting is enforceable. But any tax increase continues until a future congress passes a bill through both houses, and the President signs. Similarly, debt incurred today will need to be paid in the future.”

A Constitutional Amendment sure is binding.


45 posted on 07/23/2011 6:24:11 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: old curmudgeon

More binding than one congress “promising” to cut future spending, but if a Constitutional Amendment to Balance the Budget is what you are referring to, that says nothing about lowering Federal spending. Anyway, contitutional amendments aren’t all that binding on the future either. 18th amendment only lasted 14 years before it was reversed.


49 posted on 07/23/2011 6:40:40 PM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: old curmudgeon

If most of them ignore the Constitution now, why would they follow another amendment to it later?


61 posted on 07/24/2011 9:59:14 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson