Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
However, you will never eliminate welfare payments now.

Given that stipulation, why do you imagine you could put in place a unique set of rules applying only to legally-recognized polygamous families? Even on the snowball's chance you passed it, even at a county level, a judge would throw it out before you could pat yourself on the back.

We already have religiously-recognized polygamous "households" on welfare, so there's no percentage for them in wanting a legal marriage, if that would threaten the income.

32 posted on 07/31/2011 4:43:11 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Do you know why I love reptiles? It's because they don't play guitars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
You are thinking only in economic terms. I think it would be a better legal and moral system. By registration of the marriages the people involved would then be traceable. Not a perfect system but probably better. We have special laws on the books for special groups already; i.e. as a white try to get a government job! Apply to Wells Fargo bank! Apply to medical school as a white male. Become a provider to the Federal Government.
37 posted on 07/31/2011 4:58:23 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson